eCivis serves hundreds of local government agencies and nonprofit organizations by providing an ever-expanding database, tracking technology to monitor grant life cycles, an online university to sharpen staff knowledge, and client services to assist with specific needs.
You’ve probably heard that we recently added a new division, Grant Professional Services (GPS), to assist you in the critical step of writing and reviewing your grant applications. With GPS you can get the complete picture — the research, review, and writing — from one source.
So why have your applications peer reviewed by our grant experts? Here are five reasons:
- Increased chances of winning funding. Even the best writers need other professional eyes to find the cracks in an application. Led by Dr. Beverly Browning (author of Grant Writing for Dummies™), our team of certified writer-reviewers has an average win rate of 75%, so we know what winning applications should look like.
- Assistance from experienced peer reviewers. Our team has exemplary skill sets across the 26 federal grant-making agencies as well as for state and local government agencies. No matter what kind of entity you are, we’re ready to review your work.
- Revision, not rejection. Our reviewers will determine whether your application needs slight tweaks or significant rewrites and will score your proposal accordingly. We can save you time and frustration, catching red flags that otherwise would send your application into the rejection pile.
- All your ducks in order. Depending on the funding agency, the application process can be arduous with numerous hoops to jump through. We meticulously ensure that you’ve met the criteria along the way.
- Improved peer review skill sets. Practice makes for perfected applications. Our peer reviews can help strengthen your own internal review process.
For more information on pricing on individual peer reviews, email us at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or call (877) 232-4847 ext. 6203.
